Nurul Noviana
Third class of PETA was very
interesting. In this
session I have learned about the four models of instruction.
There were guided discovery, direct instruction, group interaction, and
lecture-discussion. All of the instruction types were not familiar for me. There
were many new terms that I would learn. So, I had to learn carefully and pay
attention deeply. I prepared reading materials first before coming to the class
to build my knowledge, because I realize that this way was really helpful to enrich
my background knowledge. At that time when I was in the class, we were divided
into several groups. Then we had to read texts. After that, some of us moved
into expert group to discuss about one types of instruction. In these
activities, we expostulated, explained, discussed, compared, explored and
analyzed about certain model instruction together. Afterwards, we came back to first
group to extend about what I have already understood in expert group. Then, my
lecturer gave time to review and discuss together. I have learned four model
instructions from my friends understanding, and recheck the understanding by
lecturer. I never thought that some of instructions had been already done and practiced
when I was at previous school, SEP, and teaching learning process in SSE. So,
this session I have learned many new things that I did not know before. I have
not only learn about what model instruction is, but also aware with different
instructions, the purpose of each model, the reasons why those instructions is
used and what kind of compatible instructions that I would choose when I become
a teacher.
Model instructions that I have
already gotten actually, I have understood some materials. First, it was about
direct instruction. This model is applying for teacher explanation and modeling
which is combined with students practice and feedback to teach concepts and
procedural skills. There are some steps which are teacher usually do in
teaching learning process. First, the teachers give learning objectives. Then they
explain and illustrate about content to students. Next, they give model skills
for students understanding. Teachers also provide scaffolding in students learning.
After that students are responsible to respond teacher’s questions, analyze
examples, and practice of their skills with teacher’s scaffolding. Corrective feedback
which teacher gives is needed for student’s learning. Theoretical foundations
that are used in this model are teacher effectiveness, social cognitive theory
which is modeling by Bandura, and the influence of interaction in learning
which is social skill learning by Vygotsky. Besides that, there are essential
teacher skills that it had to be established. They are a good
language skill, give clear instructions, a good quality feedback, have ability
to develop the lesson and give high quality of an example. In addition, there
are some characteristics in direct instructions, such as reviewing the previous
day’s work, presenting new material in clear and logical steps, providing guided
practice, giving feedback with corrections, providing independent practice, and
reviewing to consolidate learning.
Second model of instruction is
guided discovery. Guided discovery is a model instruction that involves
teachers scaffolding students’ construction of concept and the relationships
among them. It means that this model is formed by learner-centered instruction.
It is supported by theory of cognitive development, because students develop
their understanding by their own learning. The characteristics of this model are
student-centered learning, the role of teacher is as a guide, teacher less
explanation, and promote social instructional. So, teacher can give students
opportunities to create their critical thinking and share their understanding to
other person. Besides, there are five phases of guided discovery. They are
introduction and review, open-ended phase, convergent phase, closure and
application. Those phases are to promote student’s involvement to raise their
interest of topic which teachers gave. It can be concluded that this model is
dependent learning and allowed teachers to monitor the student’s development.
Third, instruction model that I have
learned is group interaction. There are five elements which is essential for conducting
effective strategies. They are face-to-face interaction, group goals,
individual accountability, collaborative skills, and group processing. Those
elements can help students to solve problems in learning situation. The theoretical
foundations are social interaction by Vygotsky. It means that students can
share their idea, understand appropriately, and give articulating thinking.
Thus, group interaction helps students about soft-skill, such as social
interaction skills.
The last model instruction is lecture-discussion.
I understand that this model give students orally information by teacher and do
discussion together to understand topic. The benefits of this model are easy to
plan, flexible, and simple to implement. The theoretical foundations of lecture-discussion
are information processing and meaningful verbal learning by David Ausubel.
Information processing is as integration between new knowledge and previous
understanding which is related and organized as network of schema. In addition,
meaningful verbal learning here is the verbal or written link of schema which
students establish with previous knowledge. So, students can be easier to rich
the goal of learning in classroom.
However there was still material
which I have not understood clearly. It was about lecture-discussion. This part
I have been still confused with the theoretical foundation and relation between
the theories and the purpose of lecture-discussion. It might happen because I
did not read carefully to this model. Nevertheless I asked to other friends
through discussion session, but I am still confused. Thus, because of some
materials I could not understand clearly, I have to find out other resources to
explore this model instruction. I could search materials in the library and
browsing. Actually I have to do exploration in reading and analyzing materials
which is related to this topic. Then, I would ask to the lecturer as a
confirmation.
Third session of PETA class was very
interesting. I could add much new knowledge that I have not known before. As a teacher candidate, today’s session would give
influence to my point of view about strategies to give model instructions in
the classroom. It is very meaningful for
the teacher to deliver materials and make students easy to understand every
topic.
I
have already felt understanding and met my expectations in this session. I
wanted to know about model instructions with example in real situation such as
in the classroom because I will be a teacher, and concept to apply these model
instructions. After that, my understanding is not used just for a while in this
session, but I can think and develop model of instructions bravely, know about
comparison between each of model instructions, explain the strengths and
weaknesses, and know the benefits to give instructions.
I
think for the next session, I expect to be brave in giving explanation and
reasons in discussion or other activities. So that, I have to read a lot and
prepare materials before starting the class. Besides, I expect to understand
other materials with more discussing and analyzing. I think it will increase
comprehension to the topics.
In my opinion, your way of elaborating and compile your idea is good. It is very detail and also cover all the material in that session.
BalasHapusGood post
Thank you,Derry :)
HapusIs there any correction or something that have to be improved? It will be helpful for me :)
Nice reflection Nov, you reflected completely about the material and also your experience when you joined in the third PETA meeting. ^__^ Keep writing. . .
BalasHapusIt's good. However, you have to be consistent in using tenses. I saw in 8th paragraph. you used past tense and present tense.
BalasHapusI had ever noticed by some lecturers, and it was so useful. so, I think it could be useful for you too, but it is good overall.
MJ
I think consistency in using grammar depends on the topic also. If I write about reflective journal, there is some part that I still use and feel until now. So I used present perfect, but if I used past tense I think it's not appropriate because in using past tense everything will lost and didnt feel anything till now.
HapusFor the example I wrote "I wanted to know about model instructions ..." it should be past tense because it happened in the past to want something. Then I wrote "my understanding is not used just for a while in this session, but....". I use present tense because till now my understanding is still exist.
Get it?